Approaches to Planning

[see  Approaches to Planning - Workshop Activity]

All organizations plan; the only difference is their approach. Prior to starting a new strategic planning process it will be necessary to access the past planning approach that has been used within the organization and determine how the organization's cultural may have been affected. Addressing these cultural issues is critical to the success of the current planning process.

The four possible approaches to planning are:

  1. Reactive - past oriented
    Reactive planning is an active attempt to turn back the clock to the past. The past, no matter how bad, is preferable to the present. And definitely better than the future will be. The past is romanticized and there is a desire to return to the "good old days." These people seek to undo the change that has created the present, and they fear the future, which they attempt to prevent.
  2. Inactive - present oriented
    Inactive planning is an attempt to preserve the present, which is preferable to both the past and the future. While the present may have problems it is better than the past. The expectation is that things are as good as they are likely to get and the future will only be worse. Any additional change is likely to be for the worse and should therefore be avoided.
  3. Preactive - predict the future
    Preactive planning is an attempt to predict the future and then to plan for that predicted future. Technological change is seen as the driving force bringing about the future, which will be better than the present or the past. The planning process will seek to position the organization to take advantage of the change that is happening around them.
  4. Proactive - create the future
    Proactive planning involves designing a desired future and then inventing ways to create that future state. Not only is the future a preferred state, but the organization can actively control the outcome. Planners actively shape the future, rather than just trying to get ahead of events outside of their control. The predicted changes of the preactive planner are seen not as absolute constraints, but as obstacles that can be addressed and overcome.
[see Workshop Activity - Approaches to Planning]
[ Back to top ]

Reference: Ackoff, R. (1981) Creating the Corporate Future: Plan or be Planned. John Wiley, New York.

Join the OrgComplexity discussion list.
Where tomorrow's organizations are being built today.
Discuss the challenges of organizational change and how an understanding of complexity theory might be applied.

As background: emergence, self-organization, complex adaptive systems (CAS), chaos, and complexity are all keywords in a new and evolving science.  This will be the study and applied learning of what is coming to be known as organizational complexity (aka, management complexity & social complexity).

 

enTarga
Home Page		 Organizational
Change		 Strategic Planning HR Planning

Marketing Planning

  Organizational
Complexity

[  Sitemap & Table of Contents  |  Contact Us ]

Anyone can link to this site without any further notification.   (Thanks for the link.)
You may copy, use, and distribute any of the content published here if the copyright is preserved in the document or attribution is properly given to the author.
Questions or problems regarding this web site should be directed to the Webmaster.
Privacy Statement
Copyright © 2008, enTarga (Ross A. Wirth, Ph. D.)  All rights reserved.
 

Last modified: June 18, 2007